idealhas.blogg.se

1. SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER INSTALL
2. SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER UPDATE
3. SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER PATCH
4. SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER WINDOWS

It is built with thousands of smart objects that are usually small and inexpensive devices and thus can be embedded in almost any object like meter, industry machinery, home equipment, and light switches. Internet-of-Things (IoT) is considered as the key component of the future Internet in our everyday life. Section snippets Introduction and motivation Performance evaluation results show that both OF-FL and Co-RPL allow a great improvement when compared to the standard specification, mainly in terms of packet loss ratio and average network latency. In addition, we present the design of Co-RPL, an extension to RPL based on the corona mechanism that supports mobility in order to overcome the problem of slow reactivity to frequent topology changes and thus providing a better quality of service mainly in dynamic networks application. For this purpose, we propose OF-FL (Objective Function based on Fuzzy Logic), a new objective function that overcomes the limitations of the standardized objective functions that were designed for RPL by considering important link and node metrics, namely end-to-end delay, number of hops, ETX (Expected transmission count) and LQL (Link Quality Level). We propose some enhancements to the standard specification in order to provide QoS guarantees for static as well as mobile LLNs. In this paper, we focus mainly on the RPL routing protocol. Although RPL greatly satisfied the requirements of low-power and lossy sensor networks, several issues remain open for improvement and specification, in particular with respect to Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees and support for mobility.

The IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) was proposed by the IETF ROLL (Routing Over Low-power Lossy links) working group and is currently adopted as an IETF standard in the RFC 6550 since March 2012. These networks encompass several challenges, especially in communication and networking, due to their inherent constraints of low-power features, deployment in harsh and lossy environments, and limited computing and storage resources. The requirement of remote sensing makes low-power wireless sensor networks one of the key enabling technologies of IoT. Other reports about instability or sluggish System performance are too inconsistent to identify the exact cause.The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a paradigm over the last few years as a result of the tight integration of the computing and the physical world. People unaware of the potential Dual Core troubles usually have difficulties nailing down the cause of their Problems.Īll that is valid only for WinXP, haven't looked into any Vista DualCore related info (which seems to have its very own performance Problems when exceeding 4 Cores, but that's still far from mainstream). That 'should' be fixed by the MS Hotfix, but I haven't heard a clear line about that. Some even reported their Systems running fine with only isolated Troublemakers (Games) and witnessed a general instability after installing the Fixes.įor that reason, Task-Binding Utilities have been created to bind problematic Games' Tasks onto one core, which seems to do a good job on Games that are coded for single core anyway. Seems not all machines are affected, some report only specific Applications/Games exhibiting problems, while other Games run perfect.

SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER INSTALL

If the System is running up-to-spec performance and no problems noted - do not install the fix(es). Overall recommendation found in many places is :

SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER UPDATE

I plan to update my Gaming Rig to Dual Core as well (Win2000 SP4), that's why I dug into this for potential show-stoppers.Īlthough I've read conflicting information on it, seems swapping out a Single Core CPU for a Dual Core can give the System serious trouble (including being unable to boot due to System Kernel still being setup for "Uniprocessor").Īpart from fixing it manually - which may or may not work -, a fresh Installation may be in order after the Upgrade.Īpart from the MicroSoft DualCore Fix (which as far as I have observed in various Forums can affect any Dual Core CPU) I haven't heard anything of a Timestamp sync error on the Core 2 Duo. The AMD Dual Core optimizer fixes this by inplementing an additional entry in the boot.ini (WinXP). Other than that, at least AMD Dual Cores can exhibit out of sync Timing errors when Win32's default Libraries are circumvented and the timing function is directly taken from the Cores. I assume it is integrated in some form in a recent Patch, not sure though.

SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER WINDOWS

I believe this was the Bug of the Windows Kernel Task Scheduler "Performance loss due to Threads rapidly switching between Cores".

SUPCOM CORE MAXIMIZER PATCH

However, the Patch they created (WinXP) was never released openly and remained avaible only upon request (they'd send it via EMail). MicroSoft in the past has created Bulletins for Dual Core related performance Problems and freezes/crashes.

But also be aware of the Problems you may encounter.